In this short paper, you will describe what you see as the top three influences on patient safety since 1999,

In this short paper, you will describe what you see as the top three influences on patient safety since 1999, taking a deep-dive into one of the influences and how it has impacted the field, as well as how it will continue to impact your work as a patient safety professional. You will also reflect on where you see the field of patient safety continuing
to evolve, and the impact on your work as a professional.
Specifically address the following:
Describe what you see as the top three influences on the field of patient safety since 1999. Cite evidence to support your opinion.
Of the
three influences, identify what you see as the most important influence or driver for improving patient safety. Describe how the specific influence has directly impacted the field of patient safety, and your work as a patient safety professional. Cite evidence to support your opinion.
Based on the current landscape and influences on patient safety, describe where you see the field evolving, supporting your opinions with evidence. Also reflect on the impact of this evolution on your work as a patient safety professional.
What to Submit:
Submit a 2-3 page Word document (double-spaced, Times New Roman, and 12 point font).
Short Paper: Main Influences on Patient Safety
Short Paper: Main Influences on Patient Safety
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTop Three Influences
30 to >24.0 pts
Standard
Describes the top three influences on patient safety since 1999, citing evidence to support opinion
24 to >21.0 pts
Approaching Standard
Describes the top three influences on patient safety since 1999, citing evidence to support opinion, but with gaps in clarity, detail, logic, or support
21 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Does not describe the top three influences on patient safety since 1999, citing evidence to support opinion
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMost Important Influence
40 to >32.0 pts
Standard
Identifies the most important influence or driver for improving patient safety and describes how it has directly impacted patient safety and work as a patient safety professional, citing evidence to support opinion
32 to >28.0 pts
Approaching Standard
dentifies the most important influence or driver for improving patient safety and describes how it has directly impacted patient safety and work as a patient safety professional, citing evidence to support opinion, but with gaps in clarity, detail, logic, or support
28 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Does not identify the most important influence or driver for improving patient safety and describe how it has directly impacted patient safety and work as a patient safety professional, citing evidence to support opinion
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFuture Evolution
20 to >16.0 pts
Standard
Describes where patient safety can evolve, citing evidence, and reflecting on the impact to work as a patient safety professional
16 to >14.0 pts
Approaching Standard
Describes where patient safety can evolve, citing evidence, and reflecting on the impact to work as a patient safety professional, but with gaps in clarity, detail, logic, or support
14 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Does not describe where patient safety can evolve, citing evidence, and reflecting on the impact to work as a patient safety professional
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
5 to >4.0 pts
Standard
Grammar, spelling, and punctuation adhere to professional standards
4 to >3.5 pts
Approaching Standard
Grammar, spelling, and punctuation negatively impact the professionalism of the submission
3.5 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Grammar, spelling, and punctuation impedes the understanding of the ideas/concepts
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
5 to >4.0 pts
Standard
Concisely articulates information, ideas, and concepts in an organized, convincing fashion that aligns with target audience needs
4 to >3.5 pts
Approaching Standard
Articulation of information, ideas, and concepts is drawn-out, unclear, disorganized, and/or does not consider target audience
3.5 to >0 pts
Below Standard
Articulation of information, ideas, and concepts is disorganized, unprofessional, AND does not consider target audience
5 pts
Total Points: 100